Petteri Räty wrote: > Please comment on my ideas in > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201499 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=137968&action=view seems to be the draft spec. I'd like to put in a request for a "link" dependency which is covered atm by build,target i guess. compile-against didn't quite seem to cover that (since it seemed to be more about rebuilding other packages) and I think it'd help for revdeps as well as representing one of the most fundamental deps.
It would be good to get dependencies fully specced out for the future. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
