Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > I'm a bit confused now. Both this eclass and the recently submitted > cmake-utils.eclass seem to handle CMake-based packages. Can someone clarify?
Yes: I've missed the discussion about cmake-utils.eclass - my version (cmake.eclass) is not needed. -- Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xBC555551 desktop-misc, desktop-dock, x86, java, apache, ppc...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
