Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:18:12 -0700:
> Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow, unless >> someone objects. >> > -- snip packages -- > > Do those packages use the modplug flag to enable libmodplug support in > lieu of (or in addition to) some other means of playing MOD files, or > does the use flag enable/disable reading of MOD files entirely? If the > latter is the case, maybe just "mod" might be a better flag. ++ If the flag enables mod support, it should be "mod" with the description saying that it enables mod support, the "how" of it probably doesn't particularly matter to the user reading about it. If there's support for mod other than modplug, then "modplug" it should remain, and the description should mention that. (See the recent discussion over USE=lame, vs. simply mp3, also a USE flag.) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
