On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:39 +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 12:41:51 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > On Monday 29 October 2007, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > > > Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 08:47:28 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > > > while that sucks, it still does not make it appropriate for this list > > > > > > As I wrote in the first post the problem appeared when I > > > upgraded from glibc-2.5-r4 to glibc-2.6.1. At this point of > > > time I was not able to decide whether the problem was > > > Gentoo-specific or not. > > > > the context of "not appropriate" is not "this list" as in "Gentoo > > specific", > > but as in "this list is for development, not support" > > I may venture to assume that repetitive error messages of > that plenty could be seen at least as a documentation bug.
Which should be filed as a bug report or sent to the gentoo-doc list. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
