Roy Marples kirjoitti: > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 15:25 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> On 19:51 Wed 17 Oct , Duncan wrote: >>> What about putting it in an fbsd conditional? That way Linux users don't >>> have to deal with the step if it's unnecessary for them, while the fbsd >>> users still get it when they need it. Seems to me this should be a >>> workable compromise, where people might otherwise be inclined to remove >>> it. >> I prefer to avoid conditionals wherever reasonable, because then you >> just have more code paths to test. > > What's more, elibtoolize does more than just fix any FreeBSD issues as > it fixes stuff for uclibc and darwin based platforms. It also fixes some > old crusty libtools in packages that affect Linux/glibc installs too. > > So just because you don't need it, doesn't mean that someone else > doesn't either. > > Thanks > > Roy >
I don't pretend to know much about elibtoolize but if it's so useful why it's not needed to always run it? Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
