Alec Warner wrote: > On 10/11/07, Torsten Veller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Last council decided: >> >> | Design phase for new projects: New projects need to post an RFC >> | containing information about their goals, the plan on how to >> | implement their goals and the necessary resources to -dev prior to >> | creating the project. >> | >> | This proposal was accepted with 6 members voting yes and one member >> | abstained from voting >> <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20061019-summary.txt> >> >> GLEP 39 was not updated and still says: >> >> | Any dev may create a new project just by creating a new page (or, more >> | realistically, directory and page) in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en." >> <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html> >> >> >> This week two new subdirs were added to proj/en. >> (One was just added for an "existing" project.) >> >> Can the glepeditors update GLEP 39 to reflect the coucil decision? >> Maybe a new project should also be announced in -dev-announce (and GWN >> if they want to). >> >> > > I'll get to that now. > > -Alec > Shouldn't it really be a new GLEP that replaced the old GLEP 39? Since the way the GLEP system works, i.e. obsoleted by GLEP ## and we typically don't edit them once their out of draft status.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
