On Sunday, 7. October 2007, Alec Warner wrote: > On 10/7/07, Robert Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday, 5. October 2007, Olivier Crête wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a > > > > virtual at all? > > > > > > <Tester_> !rdep virtual/editor > > > <jeeves> virtual/editor <- app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron > > > > > > I think the answer is none that really should, I would favor just > > > removing virtual/editor. > > > > A lot more applications need it, see subversion and cvs, which > > invoke $EDITOR. > > I think you missed the train when someone mentioned we put an editor > in system, thus making one always available.
I thought this discussion was going into a direction that had the system dependency removed. I guess I was mistaking. Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
