On 10/3/07, Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 19:12]: > >> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich wrote: > >> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this > >> > list *and* to my address in addition. > >> > >> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and > >> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over the > >> place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides this. > > > > Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes > > it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might > > Sigh. > > It is the same message, addressed To/Cc: you and/or the list, no matter which > one is delivered first. So just put all list(+private) filtering before > personal filtering. > > E.g., > > # filter duplicate-message delivery; see procmailex > # "The more you know." > :0 Wh: msgid.lock > | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache > > :0 He > * ^(to|from|cc):.*gentoo-dev > lists/gentoo-dev/ > > # other public mailing lists (more general, least specific) > > # other private filters (less general, most specific) > > # some might call the following 'inbox'... > :0 > otherwise-unfiltered/ > > -- > ...jsled > http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
What about those of us suffering with Outlook!??! -Alec -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
