On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 07:49 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote: > * Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/09/02 19:11 -0500]: > > I'm not so sure. The last rites have historically always been for complete > > removals of a package from the tree. Is there any reason to change it? Just > > removing an older version of a package from the tree is something that > > happens all the time. Do we want to clutter up the GWN (as much as it needs > > content sometimes) with this unimportant information? > > Think about apache1, php4, KDE-3, gcc-2.95, etc. > > IMHO they are worth being announced in the last rites > section, probably along with a nice upgrade-guide.
No. Things like these should be listed in "Gentoo News" with a nice, full article. The Last Rites section is supposed to be nothing more than a list of upcoming package removals. All "important" news should still be done separately. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part