On 00:25 Sat 11 Aug     , Petteri Räty wrote:
> It's not really about the amount of combinations but the amount of code
> paths in the ebuild.

Yes, you have a good point, as it applies to ebuilds. But there are still
potential incompatibilities in the source itself that this cannot solve.
At least for the ebuild side, perhaps we should get some sort of automated
tool that can analyze all possible code paths and spit out a list.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to