On Saturday 04 August 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 00:14 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > my point though wasnt to knock ati (although it was fun), the point was > > that i do not believe any closed source driver in our tree should ever be > > grounds for preventing stabilization of a kernel ebuild > > Yes, I don't like that it's closed source either. But closed or open > source. It seems odd to have packages in our stable tree that don't work > with each other? Doesn't that kinda go against the point of our stable > tree?
then dont stabilize the closed source packages, problem solved > I personally don't use genkernel, but I believe those updating their > systems via emerge world, and then running genkernel later against the > new kernel. Will likely have it fail, and then report bugs against our > stable tree. boy thats sure a pickle when we cant do s**t about it (maybe *this* time we can fix it, but that is not always the case) -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
