On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:47:27 -0700 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I meant that this should be doable without the maintainer's > consent. Meaning, I ask you to stabilize 1.0-r1 and a few weeks > later, you can decide to stabilize -r2 without me having to file a > bug. Basically, the maintainer decides the minimal revision he wants > to go stable (so bugs are fixed, etc) but the revisions after that > are up to the arch teams, unless the maintainer sees a need for > everyone to update (major bug, security). My main goal here is to > reduce the "we have to wait on the maintainer to ask" issue within a > given version of a package. Well, that's probably ok when the higher revision is just a "fixed" version, but if for example it includes new (invasive) patches or other major changes to the ebuild it's a different story. But I'd hope we can rely on common sense here. Marius -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
