On Friday 13 July 2007 01:17, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:43:59 -0700 > > "Chrissy Fullam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on > > a timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not > > moderated would be released. (non-dev sends his email, time period > > expires and no one booted it, so the email rolls through) > > For what it's worth, _IF_ this proposal goes through I'd strongly prefer > that mode of operation, so that moderation can't become a limiting > factor. > > Marius > > PS: Am I the only one who missed both reminders for the meeting? No, I missed them and the meeting as well:-(
Before I recently joined the council I was against implementing the Proctors but now that we they apparently have been disbanded I think we're better off with an open -dev than some form of moderation. Flamefest contributors should be temporarily blacklisted. We can have a -dev-announce or -dev-info for devs that don't want to wade through all the mails here on -dev. We still need -core for private communications and need input on -dev from non-devs. As a very busy person I wouldn't want the extra burden of moderating emails to -dev. /me smacks himself for missing the meeting -- Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen Gentoo Linux Security Team -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
