On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On 2007/07/10, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the no* flags were introduced more to address default behavior than > > the -* case, so yes we can kick many of the no* USE flags > > To address only the default behavior, adding "foo" to the profile USE > instead of using a "nofoo" flag would have been enough. This could > have been done long ago, but my understanding has always been that it > was not considered a good enough solution because it was not -*-proof.
for some flags yes ... for others, i dislike that idea for the exact same reason for the other profile-based suggestions: these defaults should live in the ebuild, not the profile -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
