Zac Medico kirjoitti: > Petteri Räty wrote: >> Zac Medico kirjoitti: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Bug 174380 [1] has a growing list of features that may be included in >>> EAPI-1. >>> Some of the features are already implemented but can't be used in the >>> portage >>> tree until we do an EAPI bump. The ones that are currently implemented >>> include >>> slot deps [2] and iuse defaults [3]. Are these features important enough to >>> warrant an EAPI bump or should we wait for more features to materialize? >>> >> I know Java would heavily use slot deps. What is the ETA for use based >> depends? > > Hopefully within 2 months or so. I'm planning to implement the infrastructure > that's necessary for it together with other stuff that will be needed for the > new dependency resolver. The exact time that it will be ready is difficult to > estimate because it depends on how much time I have to spend on it and how > fruitful the time is, both of which vary a lot. > > Zac
Well thinking that it will get some time to write the EAPI-1 spec and getting it approved by the council it will be probably useful to put it in initially and see where Portage is when it comes time to vote. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
