Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:50:51 -0700:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 08:58 +0000, Duncan wrote: >> So at this point it's pretty much up to the maintainer. Why are the >> rest of us still discussing it? > > Because, like everything else, too many people on this list have to get > in the last word. > > Also, there's nothing in our policy that really keeps skype from going > stable, as I see it. It doesn't *have* to remain in testing, it would > just end up more convenient for the maintainer that way, and if he > decides to go that route, I fully support it, even though it does mean > dropping stable KEYWORDS on a package in the tree (which *is* against > policy and I suspect the reason this discussion was started). Voice of clarity and reason. Thanks. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
