Doug Goldstein wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Steev Klimaszewski wrote: >>> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we >>> can't have that, no sir. >>> >> It's censorship when it's being done one-sidedly in order to skew an >> argument based upon the prejudices of those doing the banning. >> No that would be *permanently* banning an account from posting with undue cause. Not for 2 weeks or 3 months, but permanently. Even in such an eventuality the poster is free to use another email address. Stalin would turn in his grave.. ;)
imo others would protest blatant censorship quite vociferously. After all, look how they react to a 24-hour mute on *one* thread. amne would no doubt have insight into this, as would jmb, but oh dear, we seem to have lost all that experience over one thread. *gg* >> > Or if it's done to you. Careful; what some see as an accurate description of behaviour, others see as "ad-hominem." -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
