maillog: 07/06/2007-19:42:45(+0200): Marius Mauch types > On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:32:40 -0400 > Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper > > > upstream name and name referenced in every single doc in the world > > > is "ntfs-3g". I tried to rename the package however, Portage does > > > not let me since it is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed > > > me it's invalid with PMS as well. > > > > > > The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage > > > and PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the > > > version information. > > > > Would this cause problems anywhere if we had the following? > > > > sys-fs/ntfs/ntfs-3g.ebuild > > and > > sys-fs/ntfs-3g/ntfs-3g-1.516.ebuild > > Thing is: if you see sys-fs/ntfs-3g, is that an atom or a CPV? You > don't know unless you actually check the tree.
Isn't "sys-fs/ntfs-3g" the atom and "=sys-fs/ntfs-3g-1.516" the CPV? -- / Georgi Georgiev / Meader's Law: Whatever happens to you, it / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ will previously have happened to everyone \ / http://www.gg3.net/ / you know, only more so. / -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
