Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:29:47 -0500 > Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (As an aside, I didn't realize that Roy's e-mail was supposed to >> be a proctor directive.) > > He changed the subject and signed "on behalf of gentoo-proctors". > >> Is there a way to fix the current system, or should it be chucked >> entirely, as has been suggested? > > The problem is not so much the system as a small number of the > proctors. Perhaps it should be restaffed with people who aren't so used > to wielding god-like powers on the forums, where anyone who dares say > anything that disagrees with a small clique's collective views can > be banned permanently with no accountability. > Thanks for your wonderful insight, No one had any idea the proctors were a group with no accountability. When the council reviews everything they've done in the past month, we're just joking around.
Back to reality, go take a long walk off a short pier. -- ======================================================= Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Council Gentoo Infrastructure Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 ======================================================= -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
