On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:48:11 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=155 > > > > Not for the versions in the tree they don't. > > You mean 0.5.3 released 2003-12-28. IMHO that borderlines a stale > package or one that should be punted. Or at min bumped since there has > been two releases since then. With the latest one being 0.5.5 > 2006-11-19.
Eh, perhaps the vim herd could take a look at that -- maybe someone should file a bug about it. Although perhaps the version in the tree works just fine, which is why no-one's noticed that there's an update. > So is that app really used? Does anyone care about? Sure looks like > not in both cases. 'Twas added to the tree at user request. Given that Java's basically a dead language and only being used for legacy applications now, it's probably not necessary any more. But then, keeping at least one of the colliding app-vim/ packages around is probably a good idea if only to remind people why categories exist... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
