Quoting Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:37:23 +0200
Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> IMHO app-vim/ant should really be app-vim/vim-ant or something other
> than just ant.
or app-vim/sudo-syntax and app-vim/ant-syntax as there already are a
number of ebuilds following that scheme...
Well, sudo and ant aren't syntax plugins, so that wouldn't make any
sense. Also, we're keeping the same names that the upstream script
writers use, just as we do everywhere else in Gentoo. The whole point
of having category names is so that we can have two packages w/ the
same name and not have issues.
All this is so familiar... where have I heard that before?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/27770/focus=27838
The thread is pretty long, but some of the issues of the current
thread have been covered in length there.
--
Georgi
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
