On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:43PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: > No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices. That said, we suck at our > licensing information badly. E.g. every single ebuild linking against OpenSSL > has (or at least needs to have) a linking exeption. We don't flag this > anywhere. More important, what's with optional dependencies!? We don't > support > > LICENSE="GPL-2 ssl? ( openssl-exception)" > > style LICENSE content at all iirc. Similar for all the patent-encumbered > multimedia libs, which can't be distributed as binaries, but are not blocked > by some bindist feature flag or so. > License follows the same syntax as DEPEND. See http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html#license.
Regards, Bryan Østergaard -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list