On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:43PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices. That said, we suck at our 
> licensing information badly. E.g. every single ebuild linking against OpenSSL 
> has (or at least needs to have) a linking exeption. We don't flag this 
> anywhere. More important, what's with optional dependencies!? We don't 
> support 
> 
> LICENSE="GPL-2 ssl? ( openssl-exception)"
> 
> style LICENSE content at all iirc. Similar for all the patent-encumbered 
> multimedia libs, which can't be distributed as binaries, but are not blocked 
> by some bindist feature flag or so.
> 
License follows the same syntax as DEPEND. See
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html#license.

Regards,
Bryan Østergaard
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to