On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:13:56 -0400 Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn > > notices? Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by > > overusing it. > > Err, warn notices are supposed to be important warnings. If they are > not it sounds like a good job for QA.
That's a completely different degree of importance. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
