On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 04:10:56PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Sat, 05 May 2007 18:40:13 -0700 > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Let's sure we talking about the same thing when we say "implicit > > _p0". The patch attached to bug 171259 will make ntp-4.2.4_p0 > > greater than ntp-4.2.4, but ntp-4.2.4_p will still be considered > > equal to ntp-4.2.4_p0. > > OK, that change makes sense, and is in fact what PMS in its current > wording requires. One or the other should be changed to match, and I > think the PMS version at the moment makes more sense.
As indicated above, that's actually a change to the long standing behaviour; personally, I'm inclined to just block _p0 from being used in ebuild version (meaning repoman). Reasoning is simple enough- we disallow -r0 from being used for similar reasons (if it's implicit, adding it makes uniqueness annoying further it's unneeded). My 2 cents at least. ~harring
pgpEasw0IKkXo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
