On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:12:49 -0400 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't understand how nobody can see that the *TEMPORARY* injunction > against packages using this versioning scheme was put into place > *BECAUSE* nobody could agree on the solution.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:22 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mmm, no, what's weird is that you did it about two days after a solution was found... How is this conversation even relevant to development anymore? It sounds more policy, well questioning authority, and that is clearly meant for another ML. Can we please move on past the "how did the council decide to make this decision" and the "why did the council make this decision?" Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] for answers to those questions, after all, anyone can be on that ML so it's not like its going to be 'closed door' information. A more appropriate discussion for here would be "what do we do to start working with this decision?" Regards, Chrissy Fullam -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
