-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lars Weiler wrote: > Your proposal looks like a quick fix for a feature portage > can't handle yet. But your attached list of packages which > already use that behaviour is already quite long and so you > better should convince the portage-devs to include > built-use-flags into the dependency calculation.
I'm currently designing a new dependency resolver and support for USE deps [1] is one of the features that it will include. I hope to have something usable within the next 1 or 2 months. > > Regards, Lars > > PS: I should add the disclaimer, that I did not ask any of > the portage devs before I wrote these lines. I only checked > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/index.xml#doc_chap8 > and could not find that this feature is already in > development. Now I've added "New dependency resolver" to the list of tasks there, along with references to bugs 144480 [2] and 155723 [3] which track many of the issues that it will solve. Zac [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144480 [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155723 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGLPp1/ejvha5XGaMRAg+7AJ9+zn1vl/ysUENJ3atcAKlkVJthqgCg0Mqm 1pQt6TApdKu9HYIwyvzGekk= =YNhB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
