On Friday 13 April 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Except there are. Hence why we want EAPI 1 in the short term, not
> > > several years from now. The stuff that will take longer can go into
> > > a later EAPI.
> >
> > this is really up to the portage team to drive
>
> If they instead decide that EAPI 1 is a long term goal, will the
> Council intervene?

the Council, as always, will act as it deems necessary
-mike

Attachment: pgpbRAPgCXLL4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to