Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 16:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Honestly, the only reason there is any suggestion of a conspiracy is >> because of the threats being made by certain people to keep a certain >> log a secret... > > The log contains information that was given to us in confidence. How > much plainer do I have to make it? We can not, and WILL NOT break that > trust. It really is that simple.
Here's how it appears to someone reading all this, though: Ciaran *already knows* what's going on, which means that some person(s) who *were* privy to those meetings have talked, plain and simple. If that's true, then the information is out one way or another, and now the Council can decide if they want to talk about it first or let someone who wasn't actually at those meetings to divulge all the details. I guess it comes down to the trust you expect the Gentoo developers who voted for you in the first place to have in you against the trust the council members have in each other. This isn't a matter of throwing someone to the wolves, but consider the rest of the trust. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
