Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:21:01 +0100 > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> > For the curious, Paludis non-compliance is being tracked at [2]. So >> > far as I'm aware, there's no central list for Portage or Pkgcore >> > non-compliance. >> > >> Nice doc. I'm guessing that you have a list of Portage's >> non-compliance? > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> So far as I'm aware, there's no central list for Portage or Pkgcore >> non-compliance. > Silly me, i thought you'd have a detailed breakdown of Portage's behaviour for the PMS, including its problems- just not one you were about to maintain or track `centrally'.
-- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
