> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:46:14 +0530
> Anant Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 29-Mar-07, at 2:26 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:19:45 +0530
>> > Anant Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I certainly don't think so. A lot of people *switch* to Gentoo
>> >> because of portage. Portage is a core part of our distro, and I
>> >> don't see it being replaced for a long time to come.
>> >
>> > Portage or the tree? Portage is just a way of using the tree, and
>> > it's not a very good one...
>>
>> Both portage and the tree. I don't deny the fact that portage isn't
>> the best way of using the tree but it's a lot better than many of
>> the package managers (think other distros) out there.
>
> Better than many other package managers isn't exactly a glowing
> commendation. When you consider the disadvantages associated with a
> source-based distribution, Gentoo has to do a lot better than that in
> order to be worthwhile -- and it only takes one package manager to be
> better to make Gentoo not worth using. The goal should be "substantially
> better than any other package manager"...
>

Quoting our Philosophy Page:

'The goal of Gentoo is to strive to create near-ideal tools. Tools that
can accommodate the needs of many different users all with divergent
goals. Don't you love it when you find a tool that does exactly what you
want to do? Doesn't it feel great? Our mission is to give that sensation
to as many people as possible.'

I am unaware of any other goals currently present within Gentoo.  I would
imagine people have goals, projects have goals; but gentoo has none other
that the one above.  Now you can make the point that portage is not a
'near-ideal tool' and I'd agree for a large number of use cases; but at
least you'd be making a point against something thats actually a goal for
us instead of some made up goal like 'compete against Ubuntu/Fedora'.

That said; people are working on it.  You have been hearing that for years
I know; most of that effort honestly became pkgcore (more or less).  I'm
not about to say 'just give portage more time' because that is a stupid
statement to make.  However I seriously doubt paludis or pkgcore is ready
to take over management for our users.  For being a badly designed
application, portage has a large pair of shoes to fill.

-Alec

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to