On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 13:54 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > > Even though I'm sure my personal opinion is clear, I don't have a strong > stake in the ALSA herd. The real reason why alsa-driver is not getting > any support behind it right now is that nobody is standing behind it. > > If someone wants to step up and take over maintenance of alsa-driver, > and put the required amount of time/effort into maintaining such a large > kernel code base outside of the kernel, then I can accept that. I can > accept that not everyone shares my views, and although I unintentionally > managed to frustrate the previous maintainer a few times, I did accept > that he was willing to stick by ideas just as I was prepared to stick by > mine.
Lack of package maintainer, makes most all discussions about alsa-driver moot. Or any package lacking a maintainer. :) > Everyone who is claiming that alsa-driver works and in-kernel I personally want to see some chipset ID's. What exact chips people have that work, and don't work. Please provide the output of lspci -nn Only care about the line for your sound card. And if yours works or doesn't and with which driver, in-kernel, or external.. Then we can say grep kenrel driver sources, or etc for that chipset ID, and go from there :) -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
