Ryan Hill wrote:
> Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
>> I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still uses it.
>> Need to fix that up before masking it.
> I'll have a look.
Okay, x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r3 was added to the tree which fixed the
virtual/x11 and GCC 4.1 compile issues. It was marked stable on all
archs except alpha. Someone doing some cleanup accidentally removed it
from the tree instead of the broken -r2.
We could restore -r3, but considering nothing in the tree depends on
1.2.6 and the number of months gone by without anyone even noticing -r2
doesn't build, I think it might be better to just remove it along with
virtual/x11. fox fell into treecleaner territory until recently but it
looks like mabi has taken over as maintainer, so it's up to him. ;)
--
where to now? if i had to guess
dirtyepic gentoo org i'm afraid to say antarctica's next
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
