On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 04:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being > > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of > > keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how > > about the following addition to the Social Contract? > > > > <heading>We will be run by the Development Community</> > > Gentoo will be run by the development community. We will never allow > > ourselves to be reliant upon a single sponsor or corporation. > > i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the wording is way > too vague to do anything but cause confusion and people to spout long winded > rants, seems like useless nitpicking about an issue that doesnt exist
Supposedly >80% of our stuff is hosted in one building, where would we find ourselves were this building to building to burn to the ground? Get flooded?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
