Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:58:30 -0800 (PST) > "Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So you are saying you cannot see Daniel's point of view at all? That >> Gentoo should perhaps have input on a specification whose goal is to >> essentially define what a Gentoo Package Manager should be? > > Gentoo, and any other parties, will have ample opportunity for input > long before it gets finalised. Right now, though, soliciting comments > from all and sundry will be more distracting than productive. We know > it's currently incomplete and full of holes; we don't need to be told > it. > lol! you talk like gentoo were just one of the crowd. Perhaps all gentoo devs are in the peanut gallery? That explains a lot..
>> >> Really, I find this weird and ambiguous and you should probably be >> >> reinstated as a dev or be bumped off of PMS, which should be >> >> managed by Gentoo developers only. > > If you want to make such a distinction, then it's managed by me, and I > am a Gentoo developer. > And if we didn't give a d*mn about such a distinction? IOW if you were discussing this technically, instead of /politically/ *shock horror*.. >> Because it is difficult to determine 'people who know what they are >> talking about'. I would say Brian Harring is one of those, but I >> have a feeling you would disagree with me. > > The second requirement is an ability to work effectively with the other > people writing it. Hmm and he has shown such a marked inability to work with anyone. Whereas ciaran.. well there you go. Obviously we can overlook the fact that he appears to be leading a core Gentoo project when he has been kicked off the development team, for reasons which are far too tedious to discuss again this century. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
