Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Saturday 03 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > There is absolutely nothing Paludis specific in PMS. Nor is there > > anything Pkgcore specific, and the only Portage specific content is > > where we feel it's necessary to explain *why* something is a > > particular way when that why is down to a Portage quirk. > > that's fine ... that means we're back to figuring out the deadlines for > the project
perhaps - instead of talking deadlines, a more cooperative approach could be taken. How about the people involved report on the progress of PMS (at the council meeting)? (what would happen if a deadline is not upheld anyhow?) I really think PMS is important to Gentoo and i don't like scaring people off by putting unwarrented pressure on them. > -mike
pgp6Lf2L8iJ7v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
