Brian Harring wrote: >>>> | Seriously? Without an implementation, your spec of what should happen >>>> | will have loads of errors? >>>> >>>> Yes. It will describe what people think is allowed, rather than what >>>> really is.
> Don't think so; making the point that if attempting to write the spec > to target what 'people think'... that's rather subjective, and it's > easy for a subgroup of people to get ideas that don't match what > others think. > > Possible I'm being too literal, if so feel free to correct me. Ok, try this. >>>> Yes. [Without an implementation] It [the spec] will describe what people think is allowed, rather than what >>>> really is [allowed]. That is how I understood Ciaran's comment. Which means you compleatly inverted it. Regards
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
