Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:30:43 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | - I'm *not* demanding anything from *arch teams*, the bugs are for > | *maintainers* of those packages. I've already told you couple of > | times, why are you making these misleading statements yet again? > > And yet, somehow developers are interpreting your bugs as requests to > remove packages straight away. Why do you think this is? Maybe it's > because you assign the bugs to maintainers rather than the arch teams > and make lots of noise about it, regardless of whether arch keywording > still has to be done...
Why should I assign bugs to arch teams??? Arch teams are not supposed to punt stuff from the tree, it's maintainer's job. > *All* the recent forced downgrade and dep tree breakages for at least > one arch have come about as a result of your highly misleading bugs. > Granted, it's ultimately the responsibility of the maintainers to check > their work, but you aren't exactly helping them with the way you're > filing bugs and screaming... Screaming? WTF really. What's misleading about listing vulnerable versions and asking for their removal? - check the keywords and dependencies - if nothing is wrong, punt those - otherwise CC the affected arch(es) and ask for keywording/stabilizing a newer version, punt then. Really a rocket science, huh? Stop blaming me for maintainers' screwups, TIA. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
