frilled wrote: >>> Which is all very well, but not sufficient reason to screw up a project >>> that is developed and used by a lot of people. >>> >> As if we were all gonna die without bash arrays in our config files. >> > > > And once again nobody thinks of the user base. Changing configuration > file syntax means admins have to edit stuff with _no_ apparent benefit > on the user side. It costs time and opens up new opportunities for > problems. Maybe you don't mind doing it on a handful of home boxes. If > you manage a lot of servers, you'll probably think different. > Personally, constantly having to change stuff that does not benefit me > is a hell of an annoyance to me. > > Regards, > > frilled >
Once again, he said the old config would work and there would be a newer format that would not require bash as well. So the user base is handled. Stop joining the FUD bandwagon. -- Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
