On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 20:31:03 +0000 Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:27:15 +0000
| Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 
| > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 19:09:26 +0000 Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | The stuff that handles our networking maybe written in A.N.
| > | Other-Language (Mrs.), but keeping /etc/conf.d/net readable by a
| > shell | script does have advantages.
| > 
| > He didn't say "make it not readable by a shell". He was suggesting
| > making it in some format that is readable both by C and the shell --
| > that is to say, a subset of shell.
| 
| Right, and bash arrays are not shell
| http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/toc.htm

Sure they're shell. They're just not POSIX.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail                                : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web                                 : http://ciaranm.org/
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to