On Thursday 01 February 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
> Because then you get fun things like package.provided where people
> inject a randomly configured package that fails PM tests (aka
> built_with_use).  You'd have to have some sort of tautology that says
> provided packages (and crazyconfig packages) always pass any checks
> (such as built_with_use, but could be other checks as well) and then
> just fail during build if they don't.

leave it as an exercise for the user to make sure they set package.use to 
match their .config
-mike

Attachment: pgpH5ZT62BjKV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to