Robin H. Johnson wrote: > My personal view (not infra) on it, is that I'm mostly negative about > changing VCS at all - I would prefer not to change, because the status > quo works very well as it is. If a change is going to be made, it should > be taken as a chance to resolve as many different issues at one time as > possible, and for that reason I favour GIT over SVN. > <noob alert> I'm looking for a distributed SCM atm, and have come down to git, bzr, svn or arch. (darcs looks nice but adds haskell dependency.) I'd really like to know which one gentoo-devs prefer and why (without starting a flame- if this is OT then np.) I'm leaning to git simply because it's used for the kernel, which seems like a project that would really stretch a VCS.
-- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
