On Saturday 06 January 2007 13:00, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Saturday 06 January 2007 18:25, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the reason was so in the *eclass* you could translate latest to "1.10 > > 1.9" and drop the need of executing that helper function in local scope > > Right, but I thought the other one, too.. > > Well, I suppose it would do little harm at this point to default to latest, > and be done with that, and allow specifying 1.10 1.9 in the future (when > mips and ppc would keyword the wrapper) so that we cover that base too.
why not just get rid of the idea of "latest" ? is there a scenario where autotools would be inherited but not actually used/added to DEPEND ? i guess that's what this all comes down to really ... -mike
pgp0Ea3AiNLsP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
