Duncan wrote: > Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:59:56 +0200: > >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> why do you feel the need to label crap as "official" ? >> Because I consider it should be maintained by Gentoo devs. > > Additionally tho I don't know if it applies in this specific case, > "official overlay" could mean bugs filed on something else, that happen > to mention a package in the "official overlay" aren't automatically closed > as invalid, as they could be if it were "Joe Blow's overlay", but > generally aren't if the package is in the official tree. > > As an entirely theoretical but possible example, if I have xmms still in > overlay and installed, and happen to mention that an audio problem occurs > in xmms and (say) amarok, the fact that I have xmms merged, particularly if > it's still from an "official overlay" shouldn't be reason to close the bug > happening also in amarok, altho that sort of closure does happen when > package are installed independently or from "Joe Blow's overlay". >
Duncan, Off thread topic... Start something new... and please use something else other then xmms as an example or we're going to ignore it. -- Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
