-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Drake wrote: > Sven Köhler wrote: >> Have you ever thought about sollutions of that problem? It's not a real >> problem, that these files are orphaned - but they are neither removed >> nor renamed, so they stay in place and in one or the other way, they may >> start to disturb. > > Wasn't portage modified to remove unmodified config-protected files on > unmerge a while back?
It's not quite as simple as it sounds, due to interactions between merge and unmerge phases. > > If not, is this a sensible suggestion? > > Daniel > Yes, it's quite sensible. It's fixed in svn now and I'll release it as soon as it's had enough testing. Watch bug 8423 for progress... Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFaXEZ/ejvha5XGaMRAlZRAKCSF3FThVZKoiSZ3kLAS1McPjOtGgCg3fKv CYNZsSG0moQSKscaSeGr/0I= =AYBj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
