On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:49:22PM -0700, Jason Wever wrote: > Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do > any of the following (which are punishable by death): > > 1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially > when resulting in broken dependencies. > > 2) remove the last stable ebuild for an architecture > > 3) remove the last testing ebuild for an architecture when there is no > stable ebuild available after the removal
To generalize on Francesco's email, how long should developers wait for minority arches to mark stuff stable, after a security bug, and then a reminder more than 4 months later? 5 months of no response from the arches says something is wrong on their side. I think that usage statistics might point out that there are nobody even using these specific ebuilds that are proposed for removal. -- Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
pgpKmk2uLyg9u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
