Vapier wrote: [Wed Oct 25 2006, 02:56:28AM CDT] > On Wednesday 25 October 2006 03:27, Stuart Herbert wrote: > > (As a second principle, if GLEP 39 is amended, wouldn't it be better > > to publish a new GLEP to superceed it, rather than revise the existing > > GLEP?) > > i think in general it depends on the nature of the change and how > drastic it is of the original ... but that can be a bit of a slippery > slope i guess (how do you measure the degree of a change ?)
Nonetheless, I agree w/ vapier. GLEP 39 supercedes GLEP 4, and clearly the changes were extreme there. For the previous and current changes to GLEP 39 the changes are much smaller, and I'd rather see the changes done inline. *Shrug* It's a slippery slope, but I'd rather rely on common sense until there's actual evidence that it's failing. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpBtKJjfiUBe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
