On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 10:32 +1000, Andrew Ross wrote: > Daniel Ostrow wrote: > > > Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official > > Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org > > namespace... > > Really? > > http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060424-newsletter.xml
Umm... it's in the "Gentoo in the press" section, which pretty much guarantees that it isn't something "official" from us. > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/devguide.xml#doc_chap3 It is listed as one of three resources, with the GWN being listed first. > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/draft/complete/handbook.xml?part=1&chap=6#doc_chap2 > (Yes, it's only a draft, but it still meets your criteria) At this point, I think you're grasping at straws. You point to a place that is specifically designed to mention online collaboration locations such as Gentoo-wiki, and then point out that it mentions Gentoo-wiki. > Mind you, I'm not saying that I agree with linking to Gentoo-wiki - I > just think it's important to point out that your statement is incorrect. Let me simplify what was said before to make it perfectly clear so we can quit with this pointless "discussion". We do not put any form of official documentation on Gentoo-wiki. It is not a Gentoo resource, never has been, and likely, never will be. Pointing out that the wiki just *happens* to also include some information about Gentoo isn't quite the same as telling someone "go here for the definitive answer to your question." Official documentation belongs on our infrastructure. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
