Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:28:10 +0100 Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | On Saturday 09 September 2006 21:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > | > Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen > | > no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and > | > unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be > | > removed in 30 days. > | > | Unless anyone else steps up, I'll take it as I use Drupal for my home > | site. > > Given Drupal's history, is it really worth maintaining it in the tree?
I don't think so. Upstream completely sucks and keeps changing the tarballs silently over and over again, so the only solution to the above bug is to remove all of the modules/themes/etc. from the ebuild. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
