Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:13:51PM -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: >> Carsten Lohrke wrote: >>> Imho we have to remove the partly and incompatible relicensed >>> cdrtools-2.01.01 >>> alpha ebuilds from the tree. >> I completely agree. In fact, Fedora Development also had to revert this >> change >> due to the same licensing issues a couple of weeks ago. (See the thread >> spawned >> from the 20060817 rawhide report [1].) > > No, they had to do this because they are distributing a built binary, > same as Debian. We don't do that, so there is no issue for us[1]. See > my other response in this thread for details. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > > [1] As long as we take the binary off the live cd and the install image.
and the tinderbox[1.5] [1.5] http://tinderbox.x86.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/x86/app-cdr/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list