On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:29, Zac Medico wrote: > I'm not satisfied with the current implicit RDEPEND behavior either. I > propose that we make repoman force explicit definition of RDEPEND.
and i'm on the opposite side where implicit RDEPEND should be clean: - eclass and ebuilds have their own sets of DEPEND/RDEPEND which do not in any way affect each other - RDEPEND, if not set, is defined as $DEPEND > After > all of the ebuilds have been fixed to stop relying on the implicit > definition, we can fix portage so that it no longer sets RDEPEND implicitly > at all. i see it being broken regardless, might as well go for a clean break rather than putzing around with middle ground -mike
pgpEZTWAu3aPF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
